Legal Opinion
In Re Stephen B. Bogese II
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 13, 2002No. 01-1354PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Stephen B. Bogese II (“Bogese”) appeals from a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) rejecting all claims of his application for patent, serial number 08/376,290 (“the '290 application”). Ex parte Bogese II, Appeal No.1998-1360 (Bd. Pat. Apps. & Int., Sep. 25, 2000). The Board held that the claims were unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and that Bogese had forfeited his right to a patent under the doctrine of prosecution history laches. Because the Board’s decision that Bogese had forfeited his right to a patent was not arbitrary, capricious,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- General Electric Company v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- State Industries, Inc. v. A.O. Smith CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Cancer Research Technology Limited and Schering v. Barr LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Hyatt v. United States Patent & Trademark OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Tafas v. DollCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.