Legal Opinion

United States v. Hart

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 13, 1990No. ACM 28178PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

This is a case of first impression on sentencing under Article 133, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 933. It centers on the interpretation of the words “the most analogous offense” (MCM, Part IV, para. 59 e) when assessing the correct maximum punishment for officer misconduct.

Maximum Punishment Under Article 133

Prior to 1949, punishment for violations of the predecessors to Article 133 was man*1177datory dismissal. See Moyer, Justice and the Military (1972) 1036. This obligatory requirement was deleted with the passage of the Uniform Code of Military Justice; punishment for a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. MontesinosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. GiordanoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. HoweUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. EttlesonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. GoosbyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API