Legal Opinion

Timothy S. Novak v. R. Paul Gray

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 10, 2012No. 11-13196UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

This is a case about an oral agreement between business partners to split the proceeds from the sale of some stock options. A jury found that after fraudulently inducing the plaintiff to enter a valid contract, the defendant breached it, and the plaintiff suffered damages as a result. The district court entered judgment on the verdict and denied the defendant’s post-judgment motions. This is the defendant’s appeal.

I

Timothy Novak and Paul Gray were friends and business partners. In 2003 they made an oral agreement to split 50/50 the net proceeds from stock options that Gray was to receive for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Alice T. Cleveland v. Home Shopping NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas CostarricensesSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  4. Indemnity Ins. Co. v. American AviationSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. Frederick v. Kirby Tankships, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Air Capital Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Regions Bank v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API