Legal Opinion
Polasek v. Omura
Montana Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 2006No. 05-107PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Petra Casey (Petra) appeals the order entered in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, awarding Petra’s parents, Peter and Daniela Polasek (Polaseks), contact with Petra’s daughter, Olivia Omura (Olivia). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
¶2 The following issues are dispositive on appeal:
¶3 Did the District Court err in granting the Polaseks’ petition for contact with their grandchild, Olivia?
¶4 Does Petra’s failure to timely notify the Attorney General of her challenge to the District Court’s application of § 40-9-102(2), MCA, procedurally bar her appeal?
BACKGROUN…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Evans v. McTaggartAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of Guardianship of AschenbrennerMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Estate of KindsfatherMontana Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Kulstad v. ManiaciMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Adoption of CaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Jill Rebecca Ailport and Shane Arthur Ailport v. Travis Ailport Shelley Ailport Dustin Ailport Lexie Ailport and Jessica LesserWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Snyder v. SpauldingMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Michels v. Lyons (In Re Visitation of A. A. L.)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.