Monongahela Railway Company, a Corporation v. Robert H. Black
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TIMMERMAN, District Judge.
On this appeal, “It is contended by the Monongahela Railway Company that the Safety Appliance Acts should not have been applied to the case and that the verdict of the Jury was so excessive as to shock the conscience and create the impression that the jury misinterpreted the facts or the law.” (pp. 3 and 4 of Appellant’s brief.)
The plaintiff recovered a verdict below in the amount of $21,400, on account of personal injuries received when he was struck by a moving freight car on a side track at the Arkwright Coal Mine. The siding at the mine consists of four side…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yuncke v. WelkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
- Webb v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
- Davis v. PughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
- Patton v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. (Duquesne Slag Products Co., Third Party Defendant) (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Brewer v. Appalachian Constructors, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Magna Trust Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Johnson v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Jenkins v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Green v. River Terminal Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
- Hunter v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.