Legal Opinion
Green v. River Terminal Railway Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 17, 1984No. C80-804PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND' ORDER
BATTISTI, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s motion for a directed verdict under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50. Defendant moved for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case, at which time the Court deferred its ruling. Upon the close of all the evidence, defendant renewed its motion. For the reasons outlined below, the Court grants defendant’s motion.
I
Plaintiff, Willard Green, suffered injuries as the result of an unprovoked attack at the end of a work shift on September 29, 1978 by Jerald Dawson, a fellow employee at…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Willard Green v. River Terminal Railway Co., Third Party Jerald E. Dawson, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Herold v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Naidoo v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- George M. Diede v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Dufour v. UNION PACIFIC RR CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.