Legal Opinion

Russom v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided June 25, 1976No. 75-524C(4)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

415 F.Supp. 792 (1976)

Alfred RUSSOM et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, a corporation, et al., Defendants.

No. 75-524C(4).

United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

June 25, 1976.

Stan Platke, Taylor, Eichner, Hollander & Platke, Toby Hollander, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Harry H. Craig and Norman W. Armbruster, Robert G. Burridge, Anderson, Gilbert, Wolfort, Allen & Bierman, St. Louis, Mo., Lederer, Fox & Grove, Chicago, Ill., Donald J. Spero, Skokie, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

NANGLE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs brought suit, pursuant to § 301 of the Labor…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Russom v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Robbins v. NewmanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1979
  3. Russom v. SearsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Smegal v. Gateway Foods of Minneapolis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API