Legal Opinion
Russom v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1977No. 76-1702PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves claims initiated by Alfred Russom and other individuals against Teamsters Local 610, Teamsters Local 688 and Sears, Roebuck and Co. pursuant to section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). In general, the complaint alleges that Local 610 breached its duty of fair representation, that Sears breached a collective bargaining agreement, and that all three defendants engaged in a conspiracy to deprive union members of pension and seniority benefits. The district court,1 sitting without a jury, entered judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Abrams v. Carrier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- William Thomas Roach v. Teamsters Local Union No. 688, a Labor Organization, Alfred D. Russom v. Teamsters Local Union No. 688, a Labor OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Building Material & Dump Truck Drivers, Local 420 v. TraweekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Carpenters Local Union No. 1846 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. Pratt-Farnsworth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Cronin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Adler v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.