Legal Opinion

Dressel v. Gregory

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 15, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant for damages due to a fraudulent misrepresentation as to the year of manufacture of an automobile purchased of the latter. The defendant’s principal contention upon the appeal is that the real purchaser of the car was the wife of the plaintiff for whom he was acting as agent in the transaction. The automobile was bought under a conditional bill of sale and a separate memorandum of the sale was made at the time. Both these documents were signed by the plaintiff but not by his wife. Notes were given for the unpaid part of the purchase…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ford v. H. W. Dubiskie & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Vigliotti v. CampanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rogoff v. Southern New England Contractors Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. State v. KennedyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. E. J. Kelley Co. v. CarlinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966
  4. Barton v. American Dodge, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API