Legal Opinion

Vigliotti v. Campano

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 29, 1926PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover for services rendered the defendant upon his farm, offering evidence to prove and, as the verdict shows, proving to the satisfaction of the jury, that he was promised $5 a month in excess of the rate of wages that other farmers in the locality were paying. To establish that rate of wages he offered two witnesses; one, a farmer who employed labor only eight months of the year, and who stated that his only knowledge as to wages paid during the other four months was from information given him by others, was permitted, over the defendant’s objection,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Whitney v. ThacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Bryan v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
  4. Laurent v. VaughnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  5. Hoxsie v. Empire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. George v. EricsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Ford v. H. W. Dubiskie & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API