Legal Opinion
Taliaferro v. Taliaferro
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 14, 1963No. Civ. 20325, 20326; Civ. 20327PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
These consolidated quiet title actions raise issues as to the applicability of the parties’ 1943 property settlement agreement to numerous parcels of real estate. Plaintiff husband’s title was quieted in several parcels found to have been acquired after the agreement. The remaining parcels were decreed to be subject to that agreement. Plaintiff appeals. Since the wife does not, only the parcels found to be subject to the agreement are in issue here.
In view of the welter of appeals generated by this divorce and agreement (Taliaferro v. Taliaferro, 203 Cal.App.2d 642 [21 Cal.Rptr. 864]; 203…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Lindemann v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- DeBoer v. DeBoerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lovetro v. SteersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Miller v. DussaultCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Hayes v. RiskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Marianos v. TutunjianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977