Legal Opinion
Smith v. Armstrong
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 14, 1997No. 3:93CV1537(JGM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS
MARGOLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.
On August 3, 1993, plaintiffs, inmates at the Connecticut Correctional Institution at Cheshire [“CCIC”], filed this pro se action alleging defendants violated their constitutional right of access to the courts. (Dkt.# 6). On February 2, 1994, plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. (Dkt.# 20). Counsel appeared on behalf of plaintiffs on February 7, 1994. (Dkt.# # 24-25). On March 1, 1994, with permission of the Court (see 3/1/94 endorsement on Dkt. # # 18 & 22), plaintiffs filed an amended class…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Briggs v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Barbara J. Key v. Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Helfand v. Cenco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Muise v. GPU, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Jermyn v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Doe v. KaradzicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Tinman v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005