Legal Opinion
Helfand v. Cenco, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 17, 1977No. Nos. 75 C 2227, 75 C 2506, 75 C 2981, 75 C 3394 and 76 C 1085PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CROWLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in the above consolidated cases1 have presented to the Court a joint motion for determination of a class pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.2 All of these damage ac*5tions are brought to enforce rights created by the federal securities regulations and the common law.3 The plaintiffs have alleged that defendants made certain false and misleading statements to the public and engaged in or permitted the consummation of a fraudulent course of conduct in connection with the preparation, certification and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Kirkpatrick v. J.C. Bradford & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Riordan v. BarneyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1986
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Gomez v. Illinois State Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.