Legal Opinion
Gove v. CAREER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORP.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 9, 2011No. 1:11-cv-160-GZSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY, AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ann Gove filed this action alleging that she was not hired for a job with Defendant Career Systems Development Corporation (“CSD”) because she was pregnant, in violation of the Maine Human Rights Act, 5 M.R.S.A. § 4551 et seq. and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or Stay, and Motion to Compel Arbitration (Docket # 5). As explained herein, the Court DENIES the Motion.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
Under…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Intergen N v. v. GrinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gove v. Career Systems Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Fernandes v. Dillard's Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Condon v. Vanderbilt University Medical CenterDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Gove v. Career Systems Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Gove v. Career Systems Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012