Legal Opinion

Metcalfe Investments, Inc. v. Garrison

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1996No. S-6772PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Metcalfe Investments appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Linda Garrison, David Garrison, and All Alaska Realestate. We conclude that there are genuine issues of material fact that require us to reverse the grant of summary judgment.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

The parties presented contradictory versions of the events that culminated in this lawsuit. Because Metcalfe Investments opposed summary judgment below, we must review the record in the light most favorable to Metcalfe Investments and draw all reasonable inferences in its…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Corroon & Black of Illinois, Inc. v. MagnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc. v. VromanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Holland v. Union Oil Co. of California, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Law Offices of Steven D. Smith, P.C. v. Borg-Warner Security Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Waiste v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API