Ugarte v. Ugarte

I concur in the result reached in the majority opinion. I write separately, however, because this case, in my view, invites an explanation of the case law involving *253the issue of appointment of receivers pen-dente lite in dissolution proceedings.

Here, the wife asserted that the husband’s P.A. owned certain marital property in which she claimed an interest. The husband, requested the appointment of a receiver over specific assets, but excluded (in his request) the assets of the P.A.

Apparently, the husband’s request was made to avoid being held in contempt for nonpayment of temporary alimony and…