Bronson v. KERESTES
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY
STRASSBURGER, J:
While I agree with the Majority that Bronson’s appeal contains substantial defects and as a consequence we are precluded from conducting meaningful appellate review, I respectfully disagree with the procedural disposition of the Majority in its decision to quash the appeal.
It is true that Pa.R.A.P. 2101, effective July 1, 1976, adopted a laissez-faire approach to the question of whether an appeal should be quashed or dismissed. That Rule states
Briefs and reproduced records shall conform in all material respects with the requirements of these…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Banking v. GesiorskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. MarisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Sahutsky v. H.H. Knoebel SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Toll v. TollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Karn v. Quick & Reilly Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.