Legal Opinion

Brinkman v. City of Gainesville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1951No. 33347PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

It is urged by the defendant that the court erred in overruling and dismissing the certiorari; and since it amounted to a final judgment, it is contended that the court should have remanded the certiorari to the lower court with proper instructions as to the application of the ordinance. The defendant cites in support of this contention Deaton v. Taliaferro, 80 Ga. App. 688 (57 S. E. 2d, 215). This case does not sustain the contentions of the defendant in the instances here under consideration. Code § 19-501 provides: “Upon the hearing of a writ of certiorari the superior court may order the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Lane v. WilliamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Brockett v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Hood v. Mayor of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wollam v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hines v. WinfreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Haggerty v. Associated Farmers of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hines v. WinfreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Haggerty v. Associated Farmers of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API