Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haggerty v. Associated Farmers of California, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1955No. S. F. 18825Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

The sound trucks involved in the present controversy were being used on the highways and on roads adjacent to farms for the purpose of attracting the attention of farm workers as a means of inducing them to quit work and engage in a strike to enforce union demands for higher wages.

According to the majority opinion the question presented for determination is whether the prohibition of the ordinance under consideration is a reasonable one.

The ordinance (No. 415, clause (3) of subdivision (d) of section 2.) with which we are here concerned defines “loud *72and raucous noise” as “The human…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API