Legal Opinion
Haggerty v. Associated Farmers of California, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1955No. S. F. 18825PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
The county of Fresno and certain county officers have appealed from a judgment permanently enjoining them from “ enforcing or causing Ordinance No. 415 of the County of Fresno or any part or provision thereof to be enforced.” The judgment is based upon the conclusion that the ordinance, upon its face, unconstitutionally abridges the right of free speech.
*62Known as the “Fresno County Anti-Noise Ordinance,” it makes unlawful the emission or transmission of “any loud and raucous noise upon or from any public highway or public thoroughfare or from any aircraft of any kind whatsoever.” A violation…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Wollam v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. AgnelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hines v. WinfreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- City of Portland v. AzizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.