Legal Opinion

United States v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 14, 1937No. 848PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES C. WILSON, District Judge.

This is an action to. recover a penalty brought under the Safety Appliance Act in which the government alleged that the defendant, which was engaged in interstate commerce, operated over its railroad, a highway of interstate commerce, a locomotive engine designated as a Browning steam locomotive crane, which was not equipped with a power driving wheel brake.

The parties waived a jury, and agreed that the cause be submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts. From the agreed statement it appears that the defendant operated a line of railroad extending…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. United States v. Erie Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Hoffman v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. New York Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Joe E. Garcia v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railway Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Minot Farmers Elevator v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Daniel T. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  5. Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co. v. HaynesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API