United States v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES C. WILSON, District Judge.
This is an action to. recover a penalty brought under the Safety Appliance Act in which the government alleged that the defendant, which was engaged in interstate commerce, operated over its railroad, a highway of interstate commerce, a locomotive engine designated as a Browning steam locomotive crane, which was not equipped with a power driving wheel brake.
The parties waived a jury, and agreed that the cause be submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts. From the agreed statement it appears that the defendant operated a line of railroad extending…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. Erie Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Hoffman v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- New York Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Joe E. Garcia v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Baltimore & Ohio Railway Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Minot Farmers Elevator v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Daniel T. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co. v. HaynesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.