Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Railway Co. v. Jackson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 24, 1957No. 370PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

This is a suit for damages arising from an injury suffered by a section foreman of the petitioner while operating a motor track car that was towing a push truck on petitioner’s tracks. It was brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. The sole question is whether such vehicles when used in the manner here are within the coverage of the Safety Appliance Acts.1 The petitioner contends that neither vehicle comes within the general coverage of the Acts; and, in the alternative if the vehicles are included, that they are exempted as “four-wheel cars” under § 6 of the Acts.2

Both, the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. CrockettSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Shields v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  3. The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. Joe E. Garcia v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Donald E. Beissel v. The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API