Legal Opinion

Burton Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Foreman

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided December 11, 1992No. S91-258 (RLM)PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PIERCE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This cause comes before the court on motions by plaintiff Burton Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (“Burton”) to compel discovery and extend the present discovery completion deadline. Burton’s motion to compel, which was filed on December 31, 1991, seeks additional answers to its First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant Brian E. Foreman, as well as all documents required by its Second Request for the Production of Documents and Things. Following a hearing conducted on February 10, 1992, the court ordered defendant Foreman to answer…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  4. In Re Uranium Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  5. In re Folding Carton Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Thomas v. CateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  2. Jackson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
  3. Transamerica Life Insurance v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
  4. Cornelius v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1996
  5. Bartley v. Isuzu Motors Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API