Legal Opinion
Boykin v. Bloomsburg University
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 7, 1995No. 4:CV-94-306PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
I. Introduction and Background.
This order relates only to Defendant William S. Kreisher, Esquire, District Attorney of Columbia County. Kreisher is being sued individually and in his official capacity as the District Attorney of Columbia County, Pennsylvania.
On March 2, 1994, Plaintiffs Michael R. Boykin, Margaret L. Boykin, and Aaron M. Boykin filed a complaint in this Court against several Defendants. On May 9, 1994, the Boykins filed a virtually identical complaint based upon the same facts in Court of Common Pleas of Columbia County, Pennsylvania, which was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bernard v. CalejoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
- Elmore v. Clarion University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Boykin v. Bloomsburg University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Burral v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Burral v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999