Legal Opinion
Burral v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 12, 1999No. 10, Sept. Term, 1998Published
1Opinion of the Court
724 A.2d 65 (1999)
352 Md. 707
Lewis William BURRAL
v.
STATE of Maryland.
No. 10, Sept. Term, 1998.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
February 12, 1999.
Julia Doyle Bernhardt, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, on brief), Baltimore, for Petitioner.
Diane E. Keller, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., on brief), Baltimore, for Respondent.
Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, RAKER, WILNER, and ROBERT L. KARWACKI (Retired, specially assigned), JJ.
WILNER, Judge.
The issue in this appeal concerns the admissibility of hypnotically-enhanced…
Also in this document: Dissent · Chasanow; Dissent · Eldridge.
2Cases cited97 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.