Cornish Town v. Koller
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:
Defendants Evan 0. Roller and Marlene B. Roller, his wife, appeal from a judgment for $59,670 entered on a special jury verdict in their favor and against plaintiff Cornish Town.
FACTS
Cornish Town commenced this action in July 1986 to condemn approximately one hundred acres of Rollers’ land for the purpose of creating protection zones around Griffiths and Pearson Springs, which are on Rollers’ property. The springs are a source of water for Cornish Town’s culinary system as well as for Rollers’ household. Cornish sought protection zones which cover a 1,500-foot…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- FKM Partnership, Ltd. v. Board of RegentsTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Pheasant Bridge Corp. v. Township of WarrenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Pennington v. Allstate Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
- Smith Investment Co. v. Sandy CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.