Legal Opinion

State v. Messam

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 1, 2008No. AC 28414PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, C. J.

The defendant, Andre A. Messam, appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of one count of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court abused its discretion in denying his motion for disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant, (2) the court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial after a witness commented on uncharged misconduct and (3) his right to a fair trial was prejudiced when one of the state’s witnesses violated the court’s sequestration…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. FalbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. State v. NashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. State v. CabralSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CrespoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. State v. FrankoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. State v. LynchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. State v. MungrooConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Braham v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API