Legal Opinion

Braham v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 8, 2011No. AC 31657PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The self-represented petitioner, Michael Braham, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly (1) limited the scope of his cross-examination and (2) determined that he received the effective assistance of habeas trial and appellate counsel. We are not persuaded by the petitioner’s claims and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

“The facts underlying the petitioner’s arrest and subsequent guilty plea are as follows. On June 24, 1996, in the area of 104 Westboume…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Braham v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. State v. MessamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Braham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API