Legal Opinion

State v. Mungroo

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 23, 2008No. AC 28424PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

The defendant, Nazra Mungroo, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of fraudulent receipt of workers’ compensation benefits in violation of General Statutes § 31-290c (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied her motion for a judgment of acquittal in which she claimed that there was insufficient evidence that she had failed to disclose a material fact in her claim for workers’ compensation benefits, (2) denied her motion for a mistrial founded on testimony that she had invoked her right to counsel and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MungrooSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. State v. MungrooSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. State v. MungrooSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API