State v. Mungroo
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The defendant, Nazra Mungroo, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of fraudulent receipt of workers’ compensation benefits in violation of General Statutes § 31-290c (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied her motion for a judgment of acquittal in which she claimed that there was insufficient evidence that she had failed to disclose a material fact in her claim for workers’ compensation benefits, (2) denied her motion for a mistrial founded on testimony that she had invoked her right to counsel and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MungrooSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. MungrooSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. MungrooSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011