Legal Opinion
State v. Buchanan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 4, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Defendant appeals from a conviction for sale of marihuana. ORS 474.020(1). An assignment of error is that the trial court should have granted a motion for acquittal. The state filed no brief in this appeal.
The indictment alleged defendant, in concert with James Robert Forsythe, sold marihuana to Steve L. Combs on May 18, 1970. The record shows the state’s theory was that defendant was furnished with free marihuana from Forsythe in return for arranging a sale of marihuana to Combs. The testimony of state’s witnesses was generally conflicting and confusing. As to the details of the sale and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Commonwealth v. HarvardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- State v. RosserOregon Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- State v. KoppenhaferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. KraemerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. EstlickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. TempletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.