State v. Estlick

Defendant was convicted of two counts of criminal activity in drugs, ORS 167.207, namely, furnishing LSD and marihuana at the same time and place to the same persons. The court imposed a prison sentence for each count, the sentences to run concurrently. Defendant contends (1) there was insufficient evidence to make a jury question, and (2) it was error to impose two sentences.

An undercover officer and an informant met defendant in defendant’s apartment and discussed the sale and purchase of various drugs. Negotiations involving those drugs were not fruitful. Defendant then proposed a…