Legal Opinion

State v. Koppenhafer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 10, 1972No. 4753PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

Defendant, convicted of the sale of a dangerous drug under former ORS 475.100, appeals from the resulting judgment. He contends it was error to deny his motion for judgment of acquittal.

Briefly summarized, there was evidence which showed that an undercover narcotics officer asked defendant, who he believed was dealing in narcotic drugs, to obtain some narcotic drugs for him. The officer and defendant then drove to a residence belonging to persons known to defendant. Defendant took money from the officer, went into the residence and returned with amphetamines, which he delivered to the officer.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarvardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  2. The PEOPLE v. ShannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. State v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. People v. DinkelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. State v. StoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  4. State v. TempletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API