Boyd v. Wrisley
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
KENT, Chief Judge, and FOX, District Judge.
During pretrials conducted in this case on June 7, 1963 and October 15, 1962, the parties took conflicting positions as to the scope and meaning of the physician-patient privilege, when viewed in light of the discovery procedures declared by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Discovery under the Rules is limited to any matter “not privileged.” Rule 26(b). The same limitation resides in Rule 34 relating to the discovery of documents. The basic meaning of this phrase has been stated by the Supreme Court in United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1, at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Awtry v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Ranger, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. Of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Bohlin v. Brass Rail, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baylor v. Mading-Dugan Drug Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Eberle v. Savon Food Stores, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Chore-Time Equipment, Inc. v. Big Dutchman, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1966
- Ortiz v. H. L. H. Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1965
- Garcia v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.