Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. H. L. H. Products Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 7, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 2723PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAYTON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this action have moved for an order pursuant to Rule 34 F.R.Civ.P. to compel defendant H. L. Hunt Products Co. to produce certain photographs and the statement of a witness. Defendants have declined to produce this statement and the photographs on the grounds that these items are privileged matter, the photographs and the statement having been taken at the request of counsel in preparation for trial.
Plaintiffs argue that they have shown good cause for production of the above items because even though plaintiffs’ photographer did have an opportunity to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Monarch Insurance Company of Ohio v. May Spach, as Receiver for Ro-Ben, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Merrin Jewelry Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Johns v. City of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1967