Environmental Defense Fund v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
This action was instituted in the court below to enjoin T.V.A. from completing construction of the Tellico Dam Project on the Little Tennessee River in Tennessee. The district court first enjoined completion of the project because of its conclusion that T.V.A. had not complied with the National Environment Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 4331 et seq., by filing an adequate impact statement. Environmental Defense Fund, et al. v. T.V.A., 339 F.Supp. 806 (E.D. Tenn.1972). On appeal, it was contended that NEPA did not apply since the Project had been planned and its construction begun before…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Environmental Defense Fund v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1972
- Environmental Defense Fund v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1972
- Environmental Defense Fund v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1973
3Cited by51 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mason County Medical Ass'n v. KnebelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Mason County Medical Association v. KnebelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- County of Suffolk, County of Nassau, Town of Islip, Town of Hempstead, Town of North Hempstead, Town of Oyster Bay, Town of Huntington, and the Board of Trustees of the Town, of Huntington and Concerned Citizens of Montauk, Inc. v. Secretary of the Interior, National Ocean Industries Association, and New York Gas Group, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants. The Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Secretary of the Interior, National Ocean Industries Association, National Supply Company, Continental Oil Company, Diamond M. Drilling Company, Digicon, Inc., Dresser Industries, Inc., Houston Oil & Minerals Corporation, Levingston Shipbuilding Company, Murphy Oil Corporation, Ocean Production Company, Transco Companies, Inc. And Zapata Corporation, Intervenor-Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- County of Suffolk v. Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.