State v. Doleszny
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. The question presented is whether the district court’s decision permitting jurors to submit questions for the witnesses in this criminal trial deprived defendant of an impartial jury and a fair trial. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the practice of jurors questioning witnesses in the. trial court’s discretion is permissible. In reaching this conclusion, we join the vast majority of states, federal courts, and commentators that have considered this issue. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
¶ 2. The pertinent procedural and factual background may be summarized as…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Slaughter v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. Richard BeckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Rudolph v. Iowa Methodist Medical CenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cathcart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Albarran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Ballard v. Kerr, M.D, Silk Touch LaserIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Medina v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Knipes v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.