Legal Opinion

Lexann Realty Co. v. Deitchman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Final judgment entered April 3, 1980 is modified to the extent of reducing the award of use and occupancy from $1,426.91 to $1,097.64 and, as so modified, affirmed, with $25 costs.

Tenant’s lease, extended until May 19,1982 by modification and extension of léase agreement, executed pursuant *75to the Rent Stabilization Law (Administrative Code of City of New York, ch 51, tit YY), prohibits tenant from subletting the premises without the landlord’s written consent, albeit the lease provides that the landlord is not to unreasonably withhold such lease. The tenant sought…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Hechter v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. American Book Co. v. Yeshiva University Development Foundation, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Kruger v. Page Management Co.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sarner v. KantorNew York Supreme Court · 1924

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Third Sutton Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Guerra v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Bendes v. AlbertNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lexann Realty Co. v. DeitchmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API