Legal Opinion

In Re Clift's Estate

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1945No. 6732PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants, as successor administrators with the will annexed, petitioned the district court for an order directing respondent, former executor who had been removed, to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt for failure to pay over specified sums of money which the court had previously ordered him to pay over to his successors. Respondent's demurrer to this petition was sustained and the proceedings in contempt dismissed from which petitioners appeal. The only question raised is whether the petition states a cause for action.

The petition recites that an order was entered…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Rudd v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. State v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Fitzen v. Cream Top DairyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. The People v. LamotheIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Bradshaw v. KershawUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Brown v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Sorell v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Society of the Divine Word v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API