Legal Opinion

State v. Perez

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided August 23, 2001No. 11-00-00264-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOT, III, Chief Justice.

David Francisco Perez was charged by indictment with felony possession of marihuana. The State appeals the trial court’s granting of Perez’s motion to suppress. The trial court suppressed the evidence based on an unreasonable investigative stop, an unlawful arrest, and a warrantless search prior to consent being given. Because the description of the suspect and Perez were so dissimilar and because, considering the totality of the circumstances, the officer did not have specific, articulable facts on which to base the original detention of appellant, we affirm.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Loserth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Cortinas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PerezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. William Earl Tutson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Ryan Jeffery Tanner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  4. Ryan Jeffery Tanner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  5. State of Texas v. David Francisco Perez, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API