Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hutchins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 24, 1991PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

The defendant was convicted of drug offenses at a bench trial in the District Court. He requested a jury trial de novo. Thus, any errors that may have occurred during the bench trial are without consequence. Foley v. Lowell Div. of the Dist. Court Dep’t, 398 Mass. 800, 803 (1986). In a jury session of the District Court, the charges were first amended to charges of cultivation of THC (a chemical found in marihuana) and of marihuana, and of pos*727session of both substances with intent to distribute. Subsequently, the charges were reduced to simple possession or cultivation of THC and marihuana,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. LovercampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. HoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. SchuchardtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. BrugmannMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Foley v. Lowell Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. LenoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. BroganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. McCambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. PikeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API