Legal Opinion
Hurd v. Pittsburg State University
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 2, 1993No. 92-2253-JWLPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter comes before the court on Defendant Pittsburg State University’s motion to dismiss (Doc. # 18). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Plaintiff Chet A. Hurd alleges that Defendant Pittsburg State University diseriminatorily discharged him in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. and in breach of an implied employment contract.
The only issue in contention for this motion to dismiss is whether Pittsburg State University (“PSU”), as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Hurd v. Pittsburg State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Carmen v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
- John Humenansky v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.