John Humenansky v. Regents of the University of Minnesota
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
The Eleventh Amendment bars federal court jurisdiction over a suit between an unconsenting State and one of its citizens *824unless Congress has effectively abrogated the State’s Eleventh Amendment immunity. See Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 662-63, 94 S.Ct. 1347, 39 L.Ed.2d 662 (1974). The University of Minnesota is “an instrumentality of the state” entitled to invoke Minnesota’s Eleventh Amendment immunity. See Treleven v. University of Minnesota, 73 F.3d 816, 818-19 (8th Cir.1996). John Hu-menansky brought this action in federal court, alleging that the University…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alsbrook v. City Of MaumelleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- David Weber v. Strippit, Inc. Idex Corp. James BlackstoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Gordon M. Becker v. University of Nebraska, at OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Garrett v. University of Alabama at Birmingham Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.