DeCarlo v. Gerryco, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant contends that, if either party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, it was, and thus the court erred in entering summary judgment for the plaintiff.
While summary judgment is recognized as a “drastic remedy” which must be cautiously used, Taylor v. Lutz-Yelton Heating & Air Conditioning Corp., 43 N.C. App. 194, 258 S.E. 2d 399, cert. denied, 298 N.C. 809, 262 S.E. 2d 4 (1979), nevertheless, under Rule 56, “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Weatherford, Mineral Wells & Northwestern Railway Co. v. GrangerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Whitten v. Bob King's AMC/Jeep, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Legacy Foundation v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
- McKEE v. JAMESNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014