Legal Opinion

DeCarlo v. Gerryco, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1980No. 7912DC759PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant contends that, if either party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, it was, and thus the court erred in entering summary judgment for the plaintiff.

While summary judgment is recognized as a “drastic remedy” which must be cautiously used, Taylor v. Lutz-Yelton Heating & Air Conditioning Corp., 43 N.C. App. 194, 258 S.E. 2d 399, cert. denied, 298 N.C. 809, 262 S.E. 2d 4 (1979), nevertheless, under Rule 56, “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Weatherford, Mineral Wells & Northwestern Railway Co. v. GrangerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Whitten v. Bob King's AMC/Jeep, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Legacy Foundation v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
  2. McKEE v. JAMESNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API