Whitten v. Bob King's AMC/Jeep, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
The sole question before us is whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the trial judge properly allowed the motion for summary judgment in favor of the corporate defendant, Bob King’s AMC/Jeep, Inc.
The entry of summary judgment is appropriate only “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). The burden of establishing the absence of any…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Rossiter v. VogelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re ParmalatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Hellenic Inc. v. Bridgeline Gas Distribution LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Jay Group, Ltd. v. GlasgowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Pierce Concrete, Inc. v. Cannon Realty & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Williams v. HomEq Servicing Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.