Legal Opinion

Waterloo Min. Co. v. Doe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1897No. 145PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

KNOWLES, District Judge.

This is an action brought by John S. Doe to restrain and enjoin the appellant from committing a continuing trespass upon two mining claims, known as the “Oriental No. 2” and the “Red Cloud,” situate in Calico mining district, San Bernardino county, Cal. John S. Doe died, and the appellees, Bartlett Doe and Charles F. Doe, were appointed executors of his last will and testament, and were substituted as parties plaintiff in the place of the said John S. Doe. The appellant, the Waterloo Mining-Company, owns the Silver King mining claim. This lies north of and adjoining…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reynes v. DumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Kilbourn v. SunderlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Tyler v. SavageSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Eureka Consol. Min. Co. v. Richmond Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Touart v. State ex rel. CallaghanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Negaunee Iron Co. v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Mt. Vernon Refrigerating Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  4. Our Lady of the Rockies, Inc. v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In re De GottardiDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API