In re De Gottardi
District Court, S.D. California
In Bankruptcy. On review of order of referee requiring the bankrupts to turn over to the trustee certain sums of money found to be in their possession or under their control, and on a rule to show cause why they should not be adjudged in contempt for failure to obey such order.
1Opinion of the Court
WELLBORN, District Judge.
The creditors’ petition in this matter, asking that the respondents be adjudged bankrupts, was filed May 18, and the adjudication had June 21, 1901. On September 3d next following, the trustee in bankruptcy and one of the creditors filed with the referee a petition alleging, in substance, that the bankrupts were wrongfully withholding from the trustee a large amount of assets not reported in their schedules, and charging specifically upon both the concealment of $7,500, and upon De Gottardi the concealment of $6,500, and asking an order requiring them to pay such…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Blease v. GarlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- First Nat. Bank v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Scherer v. EverestCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Missouri-American Electric Co. v. Hamilton Brown Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- In re RomineDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1905
- In re RuosDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.