Legal Opinion
Borg-Warner Protective Services Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 4, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-00861 (HHK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KENNEDY, District Judge.
Borg-Warner Protective Services Corporation (“Borg-Warner”) filed the instant action seeking a declaration that the compulsory arbitration agreement it requires its employees to sign does not violate Title VII, and for related injunctive relief. Presently before the court is the motion of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons discussed below, the court concludes that the EEOC’s motion to dismiss should be granted.
I. Background
As a condition of employment,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Borg-Warner Protective Services Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Association of Merger Dealers, LLC v. Tosco Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Bao Ge v. Li PengDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Media General Operations Inc. v. HermanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2001
- Borg-Warner Protective Services Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.