Legal Opinion
Borg-Warner Protective Services Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 17, 2001No. 19-1070PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, with whom Circuit Judge TATEL joins.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:
Since 1991, Borg-Warner Protective Services Corporation has required its employees to sign, as a condition of employment, some form of an arbitration agreement or, as the company calls it, a “Pre-Dispute Resolution Agreement.” A typical version of the agreement provides that if the employee brings suit on an employment-related claim, Borg-Warner may insist on arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jennifer Kimbrough v. Harden Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia Corporation v. Monir NajdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Caterpillar, Inc., Defendant-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- North v. Smarsh, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Reliable Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.