Legal Opinion
State v. Putnam
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 12, 1996No. 95-344Published
1Opinion of the Court
675 A.2d 422 (1996)
STATE of Vermont
v.
Joshua S. PUTNAM.
No. 95-344.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
January 12, 1996.
Dan M. Davis, Windham County State's Attorney, and James Maxwell, Deputy State's Attorney, Brattleboro, for plaintiff-appellee.
Charles S. Martin of Martin & Paolini, Barre, and Stephen L. Fine, Athens, for defendant-appellant.
Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ.
DOOLEY, Justice.
Defendant, who has been charged with two counts of sexual assault, moved to disqualify Judge Theresa DiMauro, the presiding judge in the Windham District Court. Pursuant to V.R.Cr.P.…
Also in this document: Dissent · Morse; Dissent · Johnson.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. TurnbowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pamela Lea Maier v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Ball v. Melsur Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.