Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J\

The information charges the defendant with the crime of practicing medicine without a license, as follows:

“That at the same time and place the said J. PC. Miller did wilfully and unlawfully in the village of Strasburg, said county and state, hold himself out to the public to be a duly qualified doctor and skilled in medicine and the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of human beings, and opened and maintained an office for the practice of medicine in said village and therein examined, diagnosed and prescribed treatments for the palliation, relief and cure of divers and various…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Harris v. State Board of Optometrical ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. State v. McGaheyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. State Board of Medical Examiners v. FriedmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Commonwealth v. SeibertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Minersville School Dist. v. GobitisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  2. Sletten v. BriggsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Smith v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. McPheetersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API